Using modern technology, scientists have realized that they don't understand something.
In 1927, Belgian priest Georges Lemaître discovered the expansion of space. Two years later, American astronomer Edwin Hubble showed that galaxies move faster the farther they are from us. With the help of the so-called Hubble constant, it is possible to calculate the age of the universe: if you detect the growth, you know when it began – 13.8 billion years ago with the Big Bang, in which stars and stars appeared. Planets form from a tiny point of compacted matter.
But scientists have been grappling with a problem for decades: the Hubble constant, the rate at which the universe is expanding, varies significantly.
Depending on which method astrophysicists use to measure the expansion of space, they get different conclusions about the speed at which galaxies are receding.
► This The James Webb Space Telescope This problem needs to be solved with more accurate measurement data. However, on the contrary, the paradox was confirmed – and the mystery increased.
The theme?
Adam Rice, The Nobel laureate professor of physics and astronomy at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore (USA) believes that the causes of random deviations from the universe are so-called dark matter and dark energy.
The proportion of ordinary, atomic matter that makes up suns and planets (and ultimately us humans) must be only five percent! The rest is dark matter (25 percent) and dark energy (70 percent).
The only problem: researchers don't know what dark matter and dark energy actually are. Why do different measurement methods for space expansion give different results? One must ask oneself, “Do we really understand the composition of the universe and the physics of the universe?” Direct science.
His colleagues disagree on what accounts for the different measurement results. Their theories are different. Result: Helplessness…
. “Amateur alcohol specialist. Reader. Hardcore introvert. Freelance explorer.”