Everton and Nottingham Forest have been referred to an independent panel over alleged breaches of the Premier League's Profitability and Sustainability Regulations (PSR).
Forest became the third League One team to be charged with breaching the league's financial rules after reporting losses that exceeded the permitted amount during the three-year reporting cycle.
Everton, who have already appealed against a 10-point deduction in relation to the three-year reporting period ending in the 2021-22 season, have also been charged with another alleged breach. Meanwhile, Manchester City were accused of more than 100 breaches of financial rules last year.
Under the guidelines, both Everton and Forest are now at risk of a fine or points deduction.
Go deeper
Explaining the rules of financial fair play in the English Premier League
Premier League statement: “English Premier League clubs Everton and Nottingham Forest have both confirmed that they are in breach of the league’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR). This is a result of incurring losses higher than the permissible limits for the evaluation period ending in the 2022/23 season.
“In accordance with Premier League rules, both cases have now been referred to the Chairman of the Judicial Committee, who will appoint separate committees to determine the appropriate sanction.
“The committees are independent of the Premier League and member clubs. The proceedings will be heard in private with the final decisions of the committees published on the Premier League website. The League will not make any further comment until that time.”
An Everton statement read: “Everton Football Club acknowledges the Premier League’s decision to refer a breach of the Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) for the evaluation period ending the 2022/23 season to an independent Premier League committee.”
“This relates to the period covering the 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23 seasons. It therefore includes the financial periods (2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22) for which the club has already received a ten-point penalty. He is appealing The club is currently on this penalty.
“The Premier League has no guidelines preventing a club from being penalized for alleged breaches in financial periods that were already subject to sanction, unlike other governing bodies, including the Premier League. As a result – and because of the Premier League’s new commitment to dealing with such matters “In the course of the season” – the club is in a position where it has no choice but to submit a PSR calculation which remains subject to change, pending the outcome of the appeal.
“The club must now defend a further Premier League complaint involving the same financial periods for which it has already been sanctioned, before this appeal can be heard. The club considers this to be the result of a clear flaw in the Premier League rules.
“Everton can assure its fans that it will continue to defend its position during the ongoing appeal and, if necessary, at any future committee – and that the impact on fans will be reflected as part of this process.”
Stay on top of the big story
A Forest statement read: “Nottingham Forest acknowledges the statement issued by the Premier League confirming that the club has today been accused of breaching the league’s profitability and sustainability rules.
He added: “The club intends to continue to cooperate fully with the English Premier League in this matter, and is confident of reaching a quick and fair solution.”
New guidance has been introduced aimed at speeding up PSR decisions to ensure that any fundamental breaches of the regulations are dealt with in time for penalties, such as points deductions, to be made in the same season in which the charge is made.
All clubs had to submit their accounts for 2022-2023 by December 31 – instead of March as they had previously done – with any subsequent breaches and accusations confirmed 14 days later.
The English Premier League has set May 24 as a fallback date for any resumption that comes after the end of the season on May 19. This date comes before the league's annual general meeting.
As reported The athleteThis raises the possibility that teams appealing against a potential points deduction may complete their league season without knowing their final league position or even the division in which they may play for the following season.
Forest have signed 42 players since gaining promotion in May 2022, with owner Evangelos Marinakis agreeing to spend around £250 million ($318 million) to help the club establish itself in League One.
Forest believed they worked within regulations when it came to losses allowed with much of the issues centered around the sale of Brennan Johnson to Tottenham Hotspur.
The club's argument – which they made in talks with the Premier League – was that they could have sold Johnson early in the window but doing so at that stage would have meant accepting a significantly lower price. It was not sold until September 1, well after the end of the financial year, for £47.5 million.
Everton's second straight breach comes after years of financial mismanagement under owner Farhad Moshiri.
While 2022-23 figures have not yet been published, they have lost £260m over the two coronavirus-affected seasons alone. In this latest PSR cycle, they also sacked manager Frank Lampard and suspended lucrative business deals with companies linked to sanctioned oligarch Alisher Usmanov over the war in Ukraine.
Having been handed a points deduction last November for an offense in the 2021-22 season, Everton are now in the unique position of being subject to two penalties in the same season – and even having to battle between them. The consequences could be dire, as the club's long-held top-flight position is at stake.
What are the rules of profitability and sustainability?
All Premier League clubs are assessed for their adherence to the competition's profitability and sustainability rules each year.
Their compliance with the aforementioned rules is assessed by reference to the club's PSR calculation, which is its adjusted gross pre-tax profits for the relevant assessment period.
Under the PSR, clubs are allowed to make a maximum loss of £105m over three seasons (or £35m per season) but some costs can be deducted, such as investment in youth development, infrastructure, community and women's football.
There were also specific coronavirus-related allowances, and to help clubs, the league combined the two pandemic-hit seasons into one, converting the three-year accounting period to four years.
Forest's allowable losses are less than the maximum of £105m because the club was in the Football League during part of the accounting period. Instead, their top figure is £61m, which breaks down to £13m for the 2020-21 and 2021-22 seasons when they were in the Championship, plus £35m for last season, their first appearance in the top flight.
What is the precedent of the penalty?
The Everton case is only the second time such action has been taken, after more than 100 charges were brought against Manchester City last February.
The outcome of Siti's case has not yet been announced The athlete It says the ruling – which will be subject to appeal – will likely take a long time to reach.
Last year, Chelsea's new owners reported incomplete financial information relating to transactions made during the management of the previous owner, Roman Abramovich, between 2012 and 2019.
UEFA fined the club €10 million for the historic breach in July while the Premier League and the FA continue to investigate.
There have been several precedents in the English Football League in recent years, but the punishment for PSR violations in the top tier of English football was unprecedented before Everton.
In fact, on only two other occasions has a points penalty been imposed on a club in Premier League history.
Middlesbrough were deducted three points for failing to win a game in the 1996-97 season, while Portsmouth were handed a nine-point penalty in January of the 2009-10 season after entering administration.
(Stephen White – CameraSport via Getty Images)
“Food ninja. Friendly thinker. Explorer. Entrepreneur. Zombie junkie.