‘Blonde’ is ‘anti-abortion propaganda’ – The Hollywood Reporter

Andrew Dominic BlondeMarilyn Monroe Biographical Star Ana de Armas As a screen legend, he has generated strong reactions since his debut in Venice Film Festival On September 8 and make her Netflix Debuted September 28. Film critics The film, based on Joyce Carol Oates’ 2000 novel of the same title, has been described as cruel and exploitative for its portrayal of Monroe’s life.

One of the threads of this criticism was the way Blonde deal with miscarriage. The film depicts Monroe as having had two illegal abortions, which were forced on her against her will and that she was forced to. Via mock CGI, the film depicts Monroe’s fetuses talking to her. “You won’t hurt me this time, will you?” Jenin asks Monroe.

He arrived three months after the Supreme Court overturned Raw vs. WadeAnd the Blonde much comes in The entertainment or leisure industry They were thinking about their roles in the way the public understands abortion.

Regarding abortion rights activists, Blonde It is a step in the wrong direction. Karen Spruch, national director of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, tells Sharing Arts and Entertainment: The Hollywood Reporter. “While abortion is safe, basic health care essential, anti-abortion fanatics have long contributed to the stigma of abortion by using medically inaccurate descriptions of fetuses and pregnancy.” Andrew Dominic’s new film, Blonde, reinforces their message with a CGI-speaking fetus, depicted to look like a fully formed baby. “

Sprouch went on to say, “Family Planning respects artistic license and freedom. However, false images serve only to reinforce misinformation and perpetuate stigma around sexual and reproductive health care. Every outcome of pregnancy—particularly miscarriage—must be portrayed with sensitivity, authenticity, and accuracy in the media. No We still have a lot of work to do to ensure that everyone who has miscarried sees themselves on screen.It’s a shame for the creators Blonde I decided to contribute to anti-abortion propaganda and stigmatize individuals’ health care decisions instead.”

See also  Studios are preparing a new offering for actors

in an interview with wrapDominic said he does not see the film as anti-selection and that his perception as such stems in part from the timing of its release shortly after the coup Ro. “Obviously people are worried about losing freedoms,” he said. “But, I mean, no one would care about this if I had made the movie in 2008, and probably no one would care about it in four years. And the movie wouldn’t change. It’s just what happens.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *