Spectacular “Political” Report: Media Thriller on the Expression of Abortion – Politics Abroad

According to the draft law, the “Supreme Court” wants to end the right to abortion, which has been embedded in federal law for 49 years. “Row V.” The law is known after the historical case of. Wade legalized abortion nationally in 1973. Now that right is falling away! (Built report).

No matter how explosive the expected statement is, the “leak” itself is spectacular. “Watergate” blows a touch in the capital Washington because of the revelation. Never before in the history of the “Supreme Court” have draft legal concepts been leaked to the media, let alone those who have made the highest and most politically explosive decision in decades.

In fact, the judge’s verdict – at least five of which were nine members of the Legislative Council in favor of anti – abortion – should not have been published in the final edition until June. A real media bomb exploded Monday evening.



With massive barriers, the police tried to separate each other with groups of demonstratorsPhoto: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP

The “Politico” portal published a 98-page draft written by Conservative Judge Samuel Alito, 72. In short, this is a legal setback of half a century: “It is time to listen to the Constitution and leave the question of abortion to the elected representatives of the people,” Alito wrote.

மத்தியில் Among “Breaking News”, groups of women in particular reacted with horror, followed by angry reactions. According to the report, states may decide again in the future – and in 13 of the 50 US states abortion will be outlawed immediately, while in the other ten countries future restrictions or tougher restrictions are expected.

Senior political reporters Josh Kerstein and Alexander Ward sought to confirm the paper’s credibility. After all, as they wrote: “The draft decision has not been made public while a case is pending in the modern history of the court – this unprecedented revelation will intensify the debate on the most controversial case already in the present period”.

Look for potential informants

It definitely sounds like an understatement this year …

The hunt for a potential whistleblower began when protesters marched with placards to the Supreme Court pillar building opposite the Capitol – and there were first attempts by the judges to control the damage.

︎ “Chief Justice” John Roberts (67) confirmed after 12 hours of shock that the leaked document was genuine. But he also wanted to make it clear that the final decision on the future of abortion rights in the United States has not yet been made. However, legal experts doubt this.

Roberts also spoke of “treason” and announced a detailed investigation into how the paper got into the hands of reporters. “This is a unique and colossal breach of trust, including by the court and the people who work here,” said one of America’s most powerful judges.

Appointed for the hearing of the “Marshal” of the Supreme Court: Many staff (“clerks”) of the Court have access to such drafts, which the members of the Supreme Court exchange with each other until the final version arrives. Roberts said the corruption by “deeply loyal staff” would not affect the work of the court in any way.

Image damage to the “Supreme Court” of the United States

But the damage to the image of America’s most important law firm cannot yet be calculated.

“Leakage” may have been a kind of distrustful act that was speculated to prevent – or at least mitigate – the verdict by a public outcry. A decision is final only after it has been officially released by the court.

The “Supreme Court” must actually decide whether to adopt an anti-abortion law in Mississippi. But according to the draft, “Roe V. Wade” is a role model for the suppression of abortion rights.

Political earthquake

The legal drama also provoked a political upheaval: US President Joe Biden, 79, condemned the threatening move as a “serious decision”: “We conclude that after 50 years a woman has no right to choose.”


US President Joe Biden (79)

US President Joe Biden (79)Photo: Evan Vucci / dpa

Democrats are pushing for legislative initiatives in Congress to incorporate abortion rights into federal law. The “Women’s Health Care Act” has already been passed in the House of Representatives, but Biden’s party has not yet found the required votes in the Senate.

Like BILD, “Politico” is owned by Axel Springer SE

See also  War in the Middle East: New allegations against UNRWA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *